In his book Understanding Reading the much regarded (by me, at least) psycholinguist Frank Smith writes:

“it is misleading if not inaccurate to regard reading as a matter of »following the text« or to say that a listener »follows« the meaning of a speaker. Language is understood by keeping ahead of the incoming detail. By having some expectation of what the speaker or writer is likely to say, by making use of what we know already”

I wonder if the same could be said for movement classes (of Somatic Education, where sequences are like coherent stories.) Sometimes students anticipate the next movement, or a movement that I had planned to share half an hour down the road.

In spoken conversations I sometimes dart sideways, especially if I have the feeling my conversation partner can handle it, or is up to it. Not so much as a test of skills and judgement, but for fun, a breeze of fresh air, to stimulate the mind. I sometimes do this when I talk to children, to show them that not all grown-ups are stiff and boring and dead serious to the point of grey face… and hope that they figure they may play with words and thoughts themselves as well. Can you follow me? I think comedians do this too, they put things in a new context, introduce a new twist. It’s just a jump to the left. And then a step to the right. With your hands on your hips. But they do it in order to stimulate the mind AND to get a laugh. Maybe that’s why it’s so easy to listen (to some of) them.

I think there’s much to be said about movement classes. Might be we’re just at the beginning.

Workshop 1: Why move so slowly? Focus on Pelvis

We will experiment with a progressive sequence of movements. In the beginning we will move very slowly, and then make the movements bigger and bigger. The overall goals are:

1. Release tension around the hip joints (IT-Band area and adductors),
2. Activate the rib cage to support the movements of the pelvis
3. Comfortable and safe movements that are suitable for every age, from young fitness professionals up to the active elder community.

Workshop 2:  Why move so slowly? Focus on Neck and Upper chest

We will experiment with a progressive sequence of movements. In the beginning we will move very slowly, and then make the movements bigger and bigger. The overall goals are:

1. Release tension in the neck and upper chest (in between the shoulder blades and under the arm pits),
2. Learn to use movement differentiation as a tool
3. Comfortable and safe movements that are suitable for every age, from young fitness professionals up to the active elder community.

Workshop benefits for the student / workshop attendee

Students will experience first hand

1. Rather than challenge your skills in the areas of flexibility, strength and endurance, in this workshop you will improve your skills in the areas of movement refinement and how well you can sense movement.
2. How movements that are done very slowly and small can have a big effect.
3. Make upright walking feel and look smoother, lighter and more elegant.

Short Bio of yourself

Alfons Grabher, born in 1974 in Vienna, Austria, is a Guild Certified Feldenkrais Practitioner, and a graduate Engineer from the University of Applied Sciences, Vienna, specialised in Biomedical Engineering. Alfons has worked for over a decade as a Software Engineer, and since 2006 as a teacher of Somatic Education and the Feldenkrais Method.

The workshops will be online on Zoom, Language: English with translation to and from Chinese, Main audience: China, Time Zone: CST, Dates: 22.10.2022, 5.11.2022

This Saturday I’ll teach a workshop online, for a Chinese audience in China. Three hours. Part of that time will be painstakingly eaten away by the translation, English-Chinese and Chinese-English, since my Chinese language skills are not sufficient enough for teaching. And then, what to make of it? Three hours? I’m used to teaching 45-60 minutes online sessions.

However, I recall a Zoom session I had some time ago, where two students and me conferred ABOUT a one hour online presentation. We chatted away 2 hours in no time. We did that three times, on three separate appointments. In fact, the last Zoom session lastet well over 3 hours, and we could have gone on, that’s how lively, inspiring and interesting our conversation and sharing was!

Also, I recall a Zoom call with my brother and one of our best friends, a year ago or so. We too chatted away over 3 hours, and only had to stop because my brother had another appointment, en plus it was nearing 1am in my timezone and I grew considerably sleepy.

But an online workshop over 3 hours with a group? How would you structure something like this without getting that dreaded back-to-school feeling? I recall well—from multiple occasions—that people are shy to speak in front of others. Especially online. Probably for multiple reasons, good reasons. Reputation, social credit, hierarchy, all the heads of Medusa snapping at any student who comes forth to speak or ask questions at once. And for me the same problem, in the past I got criticised for answering some questions too detailed, and other questions too short. Back-to-school is politics, career, money.

So- I might go in like I did at the above mentioned two Zoom meetings. I might not prepare a set list. I might not plan set activities and times at all. I might just briefly re-read what I’m supposed to cover according to the advertisement copy I handed in to sell the workshop. I might go in as a human, come as a friend, come as I am, and will not “teach” but just be. Maybe something good will come from that. And if not, who needs three-hour-long Zoom workshops anyways?

Five years ago—as of today—I made a little video with ideas for fall prevention [Youtube: A great exercise for fall prevention]. No, it didn’t go viral. No, it wasn’t picked up by the Good Morning America TV Show. No, it didn’t buy me a house and a Ferrari. But I always liked to think back to this video, I really liked the ideas in it. And, have you looked at pictures of yourself from 5 years ago? You looked amazing! And so did I.

So- yesterday I went ahead and did a new version of this [Youtube: Fall prevention & balance training for 65+] and I think it turned out pretty well. Oh- and I just now spend one more hour on the thumbnail. Would that I knew if it got better though. Have a look-see, which one is more appealing, in a clickedy-click on that thumbnail kind-of way? I tend to like the first one more. But the second one kind-of looks cleaner and more modern. Yes no?

The journey continues- this morning I was going through the movements again, since I really like them. And I figured this is not just for seniors, but for everyone. Maybe most of all for myself. My legs lost a lot of power since I was 17, and I need to build up again.

Maybe with music, or with a song. However, for the non-musical self inside of me I built it a bit more systematically:

1. Imagine a clock face on the floor, with 12 o’clock in your front, 3 o’clock to yo’ right, 6 o’clock at your back, and 9 o’clock you-know-where.
2. Stand with your feet (kind-of) parallel, your feet next to each other, that’s our starting position. Keep your right foot standing where it is, don’t move it. And then take a step with your left foot onto 12 o’clock and back to the starting position.
3. Then a step to 11 o’clock, and back to start, and then to 10 and to 9, to 8… all the way to 6 (and maybe even 5), and so forth.
4. And then the same thing, but turn your left foot, together with your leg and shoulders and head and pelvis. But always keep your right foot planted in the starting position. Stay with your right foot in the same position. Bend your knees. Bend your knees a lot. And so forth. And so forth.
5. For a more Patrick-Step (The kneesovertoesguy) kind-of variation you could stand with your right foot on a wedge, or on a wedge shaped shoe, a women’s comfort slipper with a high heel, of all fashion items. And so forth. And so forth. And then walk like a crab in a circle.

I might make one more video of it. It’s fun! Or at least- not as boring as single-motion exercises, the ones that fitness professionals and fitness victims all alike perform in the gyms. Single-motion repetition drills really fry my brain, like, braindead and all. What good are muscles without a well functioning brain? People pumping iron with big headphones on and loud heavy-metal music, people trying to tickle some neurons while they starve them to death at the same time.

So- I’m sure I’m not the first to think about language and word choice. There must be a lot out there. Innit?

Now- how to instruct something like this, the action you see on the picture above? Is it a turn of the head to the right? A shift of the eyes to the right? Or should we say, turn the arms? Turn the shoulders? Turn the shoulder girdle?

Obviously we need a word to describe the movement, and also a word to say what we’re moving. What would be the minimum, how deep (or elaborate) do we need (or want) to go? Do we instruct a movement or an action?

An external rotation of the right upper arm, together with an internal rotation of the left upper arm, the right shoulder blade sliding closer to the spine, while the left shoulder blade is sliding further away from the spine…

…the left knee is moving forwards in space relative to the seating area, a turn of the pelvis to the right, with the point of turning, where is it, on the right sit bone? On the left? Both? Is it a turning or a tilting? Or should we shout out, “Hey, look behind you!”

What will be different? What will be the differences? Where’s the learning, the refinement? What do we want? What do we need?

Yesterday late last night I was lying awake and thinking about the delivery of movement instructions, “What if I would not give movement instructions but instead turn everything into a question?”

Are you able to lie down on the floor, on your back? What would you need to be comfortable? Are you able to roll your right leg? What do I mean by, “to roll your leg?” What does it require? What does it do? Where does it lead to, what would come next?

Today late afternoon I scraped this “questions only” project again. Seems complicated and one sided, kind of.